WORLD RISK MANAGEMENT
RESEARCH & EVIDENCE

Better context.
More informed questions.

A curated primary-source reading room. Research reviewed 12 November 2026; this is a dated editorial selection, not a live data feed.

Global Risks Report 2026 / 14 January 2026

Global risks across different horizons

The 2026 report examines risks through multiple timeframes and is informed by expert perceptions. It offers a useful lens for strategic conversations.

Practical use: Use it to widen a workshop agenda. Do not treat its rankings as an organisation-specific probability model.
Source: Global Risks Report 2026 →
Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 / 26 February 2024

Cybersecurity outcomes, from governance to recovery

CSF 2.0 structures cybersecurity outcomes around Govern, Identify, Protect, Detect, Respond and Recover. It can support a common language across leadership and technical teams.

Practical use: Use the functions to identify gaps in responsibility and evidence. A self-assessment is not certification.
Source: Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 →
Global Risk Management Survey: key findings / 1 October 2025

Business concerns in a connected risk environment

Aon’s 2025 survey identifies cyber attack or data breach as the leading current concern among its respondents. This reflects reported business priorities.

Practical use: Compare it with your own risk register. The respondents and survey design limit generalisation; rankings are not measured event frequencies.
Source: Global Risk Management Survey: key findings →

How to read the evidence

Facts describe published material. Interpretation explains why it may matter. Planning scenarios use your assumptions. We keep these three categories separate and do not reproduce third-party charts or reports.

Sources can change after review. Check the original publication before using it for a material decision.

Explore the industry ecosystem →